Table 4 etr-1 interactions with Wnt mutations
AQRPQR
Genotype12345p12345np
etr-1(lq61)8512201354088100
egl-20(gk453010)991000945010100
egl-20(n585)1000000972100100
egl-20(mu39)9460003672352100a< 0.001
cwn-1(ok546)71236000000100100
cwn-2(ok895)919000000496100
lin-44(e1792)9910000000100100
cwn-1(ok546); egl-20(n585)52335343b< 0.00101234512100a< 0.001
cwn-1(ok546); cwn-2(ok895)3657610c< 0.0010000100100
lin-44(n1792);egl-20(gk453010)88120006130702100a< 0.001
egl-20(n585) cwn-2(ok895)1667170013741300100
egl-20(n585) cwn-2(ok895); cwn-1(ok546)217081024542110100
etr-1(lq61); egl-20(gk453010)87111107120801100a< 0.001
etr-1(lq61); egl-20(mu39)69299104431277100d< 0.001
etr-1(lq61); cwn-2(ok895)5635702e0.0033121183100
etr-1(lq61); lin-44(e1792)8116300011395100
etr-1(lq61); egl-20(n585) cwn-20(ok895)41401540f< 0.001433413100100f< 0.001
  • a compared to egl-20(gk453010) and egl-20(n585) at PQR position 1.

  • b compared to cwn-1(ok546) at AQR position 1.

  • c compared to the additive effects of cwn-1(ok546) and cwn-2(ok895) at AQR position 1.

  • d compared to egl-20(mu39) at PQR position 1.

  • e compared to the additive effects of etr-1(lq61) and cwn-2(ok895) at AQR position 1.

  • f compared to the egl-20(n585) cwn-2(ok895) at AQR position 1 and PQR position 5.