Table 6 Maize data set 2
IBCFMFMEMTME
No MarkersWith MarkersNo MarkersNo MarkersWith MarkersNo MarkersWith Markers
Env–TraitMeanSEMeanSEMeanSEMeanSEMeanSEMeanSEMeanSE
EBU_GY0.2320.0170.2140.0230.2090.0130.2360.0190.3450.0180.2330.0200.3530.019
EBU_ASI0.3750.0200.4340.0120.3790.0190.3100.0180.5100.0150.3260.0190.4950.014
EBU_PH0.2140.0220.4210.0180.1880.0210.1230.0200.5150.0140.1170.0220.4850.016
KAK_GY0.2810.0230.2850.0220.2690.0260.2690.0170.4010.0210.2630.0190.3990.023
KAK_ASI0.3320.0160.2720.0180.3360.0180.2980.0200.4180.0180.3160.0190.4120.017
KAK_PH0.3170.0230.2720.0230.2340.0240.2600.0190.4090.0200.2780.0190.4520.022
KTI_GY0.2060.0160.1970.0180.1900.0180.2360.0150.2990.0180.2340.0180.3060.020
KTI_ASI0.2690.0200.0830.0240.2860.0190.3030.0170.2730.0220.2640.0150.2390.021
KTI_PH0.2820.0190.4450.0140.2530.0220.2350.0190.4750.0160.2330.0200.4910.015
Average0.2790.0190.2920.0190.2610.0200.2520.0180.4050.0180.2520.0190.4040.019
  • Prediction accuracies with Pearson correlation for each environment–trait (Env–Trait) combination of the proposed methods for the maize data set under cross-validation scheme CV1. The best predictions of the seven methods are in boldface, and the comparisons are made by row. “No markers” means that genomic information was not used, while “with markers” means that genomic information was used. MF, matrix factorization.