Table 1 Descriptive statistics of 10 IR64 indica × tropical japonica diversity donor recombinant inbred populations
Diversity Donor of PopulationCoverage per Filtered VariantaFiltered VariantsParental Imputed Filtered VariantsImputed VariantsProportion LB-Impute ImputedAverage HeterozygositybProportion IR64cProportion Diversity DonordPre-BP-Impute LinesPost-BP-Impute LinesePost-BP-Impute Variantsf
Azucena2.077,192,7507,246,85515,327,7500.9900.520.4718718415,013,664
ITA1642.035,895,1065,959,22012,230,3910.990.020.550.4118418011,970,900
CT10035-42-4-4-M2.007,595,5317,597,27515,452,5150.980.030.520.4418817814,656,876
CT10006-7-2-M-22.567,311,4737,341,60413,657,8280.990.020.540.4319018613,295,466
CT10037-56-6-M-M2.036,718,3426,656,77413,920,2420.990.020.530.4418818113,302,052
CT10045-5-5-M-12.359,076,0189,055,98116,094,3250.990.030.50.4618817915,218,938
CT10005-12-1-M-42.238,488,9108,469,84315,703,3530.990.020.510.4618818415,284,880
CT9998-41-12-M-42.074,410,5054,332,1918,961,3150.990.030.510.451881798,519,684
CT8556-37-1-3-1-M1.944,394,7062,602,5205,454,2130.980.030.520.431881775,126,982
CT10035-26-4-2-M2.257,061,9877,014,02913,684,8890.990.050.520.4219017711,715,630
  • a SD ranged from 0.28 to 1.54.

  • b SD was << 0.001. Expected heterozygosity maximum ≤ (0.56 = 1.6%).

  • c SD ranged from 0.10 to 0.12.

  • d SD ranged from 0.10 to 0.12.

  • e Lines ≥ 0.1 heterozygous removed.

  • f No missing variants in any line.