Cross^{a} | PI^{b} | Lines^{c} | P:Np^{d} | Exp-rt^{e} | χ^{2} | P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

[(PA3 × TN20) × PA3] | Peking | 90 | 30:60 | 3:1 | 3.333 | 0.068 |

[(PA3 × TN20) × PA3] | PI 88788 | 90 | 68:22 | 3:1 | 0.015 | 0.903 |

[(PA3 × TN20) × PA3] | PI 90763 | 90 | 16:74 | 3:1 | 2.504 | 0.114 |

[(PA3 × TN20) × PA3] | PI 437654 | 90 | 0:90 | 3:1 | 270 | <0.001 |

↵a TN20 was the parasitic and PA3 was the nonparasitic

*H. glycines*inbred line on Peking, PI 88788, PI 90763, and PI 437654. The BC_{1}F_{2}mating strategy used PA3 as the female and recurrent parent in a single backcross.↵b Plant introduction.

↵c Number of progeny lines from the mating.

↵d Numbers of parasitic (P) and nonparasitic (Np) lines on the indicator lines. Parasitic lines were scored based on a >10% female index.

↵e Expected segregation ratio for a single gene.