Table 3 Description of parental-specific and integrated maps
LG‘273-7’-specific Map‘T17-349’-specific Map
Number of LociLength (cM)Densitya (cM per marker)Segregation Distortion Ratio (%)bNumber of LociLength (cM)Densitya (cM per marker)Segregation Distortion Ratio (%)b
1a54153.02.8350.063153.82.4471.4
1b83186.52.2553.037178.54.8259.5
2a55122.32.2234.562197.63.2058.1
2b47159.03.3866.058179.73.1036.2
3a82150.01.8319.551154.53.0337.3
3b101147.41.4628.763107.51.7152.4
4a100158.31.5826.062129.42.0975.8
4b70139.51.9928.676155.52.0540.8
5a64138.22.1629.764142.42.2235.9
5b47149.63.1834.064175.02.7350.0
6a2497.64.0741.722120.55.4854.6
6b55140.02.5436.416124.37.7750.0
7a38129.33.4057.956252.34.5144.6
7b72174.52.4227.844115.42.6272.7
8a89126.81.4331.585174.52.0560.0
8b78150.71.9339.74089.62.2457.5
Total10592322.92.1935.78632450.32.8453.3
LGIntegrated Map
Number of LociLength (cM)Densitya (cM per marker)Segregation Distortion Ratio (%)b
1a106159.11.5057.6
1b113190.91.6962.0
2a107122.91.1545.8
2b98207.82.1250.0
3a124172.51.3928.2
3b146142.60.9841.8
4a141157.01.1151.8
4b134177.11.3235.8
5a118164.51.3935.6
5b108156.21.4539.8
6a(44)c(109.08)c(2.48)c(50.0)c
6b63132.42.1039.7
7a86155.71.8153.5
7b101151.51.5046.5
8a146166.11.1452.1
8b108146.01.3544.4
Total17432511.31.4445.6
  • a Average length between two loci.

  • b A significant level at P < 0.05.

  • c LG 6a was not integrated because of fewer bi-parental markers. Therefore, the number of locus and length were investigated as follows: number of locus = (total number of the parental-specific maps) – (number of commonly mapped markers on the parental-specific maps); length = average length of the parental-specific maps.