- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Pedro Reis Rodrigues, Tiffany K Kaul, Jo-Hao Ho, Mark Lucanic, Kristopher Burkewitz, William B Mair, Jason M Held, Laura M Bohn, Matthew S Gill, Synthetic Ligands of Cannabinoid Receptors Affect Dauer Formation in the Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics, Volume 6, Issue 6, 1 June 2016, Pages 1695–1705, https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.116.026997
- Share Icon Share
Abstract
Under adverse environmental conditions the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans can enter an alternate developmental stage called the dauer larva. To identify lipophilic signaling molecules that influence this process, we screened a library of bioactive lipids and found that AM251, an antagonist of the human cannabinoid (CB) receptor, suppresses dauer entry in daf-2 insulin receptor mutants. AM251 acted synergistically with glucose supplementation indicating that the metabolic status of the animal influenced the activity of this compound. Similarly, loss of function mutations in the energy-sensing AMP-activated kinase subunit, aak-2, enhanced the dauer-suppressing effects of AM251, while constitutive activation of aak-2 in neurons was sufficient to inhibit AM251 activity. Chemical epistasis experiments indicated that AM251 acts via G-protein signaling and requires the TGF-β ligand DAF-7, the insulin peptides DAF-28 and INS-6, and a functional ASI neuron to promote reproductive growth. AM251 also required the presence of the SER-5 serotonin receptor, but in vitro experiments suggest that this may not be via a direct interaction. Interestingly, we found that other antagonists of mammalian CB receptors also suppress dauer entry, while the nonselective CB receptor agonist, O-2545, not only inhibited the activity of AM251, but also was able to promote dauer entry when administered alone. Since worms do not have obvious orthologs of CB receptors, the effects of synthetic CBs on neuroendocrine signaling in C. elegans are likely to be mediated via another, as yet unknown, receptor mechanism. However, we cannot exclude the existence of a noncanonical CB receptor in C. elegans.
During development, Caenorhabditis elegans can enter an alternate larval stage, called the dauer larva, that allows the animal to survive adverse environmental conditions, such as high temperature, low food availability, and high population density (Golden and Riddle 1984a). Genetic analysis of dauer formation has defined neuroendocrine signals that act through a TGF-β-like signaling and an insulin-like signaling pathway, which converge on the cytochrome P450 DAF-9 and the nuclear receptor DAF-12 (Hu 2007). The identification of dafachronic acids (Motola et al. 2006) and other sterol acids (Held et al. 2006, Mahanti et al. 2014), which are produced by DAF-9 and act as ligands for DAF-12, confirmed the existence of lipophilic hormones that act downstream of TGF-β and insulin signaling to instruct the decision to proceed with reproductive growth. Likewise, the identification of ascarosides (ascr) as the bioactive components of dauer-inducing pheromone (Ludewig and Schroeder 2013) has confirmed the existence of small molecules that influence the activity of the neuroendocrine pathways in response to environmental conditions.
Evidence for small molecule signals that act through G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) to modulate dauer formation initially came from genetic evidence. daf-11, a guanylyl cyclase expressed in a subset of neurons, has a strong dauer constitutive (Daf-c) phenotype and was implicated in second messenger signaling downstream of chemosensory signaling and G-proteins (Birnby et al. 2000, Bargmann 2006). Furthermore, mutations in a subset of the nematode G protein subunits confer insensitivity to dauer pheromone (Lans and Jansen 2007, Zwaal et al. 1997, Lewis and Hodgkin 1977). The identification of ascarosides as the bioactive components of dauer pheromone further confirmed the role of GPCR signaling in modulating dauer entry. Two GPCRs, SRBC-64 and SRBC-66, have been shown to bind both ascr#2 and ascr#3 to induce dauer formation and likely function upstream of TGF-β and insulin-like signaling (IIS) (Kim et al., 2009). Two other GPCRs, DAF-37 and DAF-38, have been shown to bind ascr#2 to promote dauer formation by repressing TGF-β signaling (Park et al. 2012). Likewise, srg-36 and srg-37 are GPCRs that are expressed in the sensory cilia of ASI neurons and mutations in these genes confer resistance to ascr#5, suggesting that they might bind this molecule to induce dauer formation (O’Rourke et al. 2013).
While ascaroside signaling is concerned with promoting dauer entry, food signals from the environment promote reproductive growth (Golden and Riddle 1984b). In contrast to pheromone signaling, much less is known about the identity of environmental food signals and their signaling mechanisms. We have previously determined that bacterial fatty acids can promote recovery from the dauer stage via a mechanism that is dependent on daf-11 (Kaul et al. 2014), suggesting that food signals may also mediate their effects via GPCR signaling. In addition to small molecules that are sensed from the environment, it is likely that other endogenous small molecules contribute to the decision to proceed with reproductive growth or enter dauer. Indeed, we have previously found that a molecule from the N-acyl ethanolamine class of bioactive lipids can promote reproductive growth under dauer-inducing conditions (Lucanic et al. 2011). The existence of ∼80 cytochrome P450s (Menzel et al. 2001), which have the potential to synthesize small molecules, along with 284 nuclear receptors (Gissendanner et al. 2004, Robinson-Rechavi et al. 2005, Van Gilst et al. 2002), as well as over 1000 predicted G-protein coupled receptors in the C. elegans genome (Keating et al. 2003, Robertson and Thomas 2006), indicates that there are likely to be many more pathways that are responsive to small molecules in the worm. Despite this, we still know very little about the identity of other lipophilic hormones or small molecules that affect dauer formation or other phenotypes in the worm.
In this study, we took a screening approach, using a small library of bioactive lipids and related compounds, to identify small molecules that could promote reproductive growth in Daf-c mutants. We found that AM251, an inverse agonist/antagonist of the mammalian CB receptor (Gatley et al. 1996), suppressed dauer formation in daf-2 insulin receptor mutants, by acting through G-protein signaling to activate TGF-β and insulin peptide pathways in the ASI chemosensory neuron. Since C. elegans does not possess obvious orthologs of the mammalian CB receptors (McPartland 2004, McPartland et al. 2006), AM251 likely acts via a different receptor mechanism. However, we also observed that a number of other synthetic CBs, both antagonists and agonists, also affect dauer formation, raising the possibility that the worm expresses a novel CB-like receptor that has conserved function but sequence divergence compared with the canonical mammalian CB receptors.
Materials and Methods
Chemicals
AM251, SR141716A (Rimonabant), URB447, LH21, AM630, O-2545, and CP55,940 were obtained from Cayman Chemical (Ann Arbor, MI) and Gp1a was obtained from Tocris Bioscience (Minneapolis, MN).
C. elegans maintenance and strains
C. elegans strains were maintained as previously described (Brenner 1974). The following strains were obtained from the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center at the University of Minnesota: Bristol N2 (wild type), DR1572[daf-2(e1368)], DR1568[daf-2(e1371)], RB653[ogt-1(ok430)], CB1372[daf-7(e1372)], CB1364[daf-4(e1364)], DR47[daf-11(m47)], RB754[aak-2(ok524)], CB928[unc-31(e928)], NL332[gpa-1(pk15)], NL335[gpa-3(pk35)], NL790[gpa-4(pk381)], NL1137[gpa-5(pk376)], NL1146[gpa-6(pk480)], NL1147[gpa-10(pk362)], NL788[gpa-14(pk342)], RB2277[ser-5(ok3087)], MT15434[tph-1(mg280)], PY6560 [srbc-64(tm1946)], and PY6523[srbc-66(tm2943)]. aak-2(ok524) was backcrossed to wild type N2 five times. Constitutively active (CA) AMPK strains—global expression - uthIs248[aak-2p::aak-2 genomic (aa1-321)::GFP::unc-54 3′UTR]; neuronal expression - wbmEx66(rab-3p::aak-2 (aa1-321 cDNA)::tdTomato::unc-54 3′UTR); intestinal expression - wbmEx67(gly-19p::aak-2 (aa1-321 cDNA)::tdTomato::unc-54 3′UTR); muscle expression - wbmEx68(myo-3p::aak-2 (aa1-321 cDNA)::tdTomato::unc-54 3′UTR)—were generated as previously described (Burkewitz et al. 2015). ins-6(tm2416) and daf-28(tm2308) were obtained from Dr. Shohei Mitani at the National Bioresource Project at Tokyo Women’s Medical University School of Medicine and were backcrossed five times to N2.
The ins-6 and daf-28 mutants were each crossed into daf-2(e1371) as previously described (Kaul et al. 2014). All other double mutants were generated by standard methods and crosses were confirmed by PCR genotyping or sequencing where applicable.
The ASJ ablation strains jxEx18[unc-122p::GFP] and daf-2(e1368); jxEx100[pQZ37(trx-1p::ICE); unc-122p::GFP] were a kind gift from Dr. Joy Alcedo (Cornils et al. 2011). For ablation of the ASI neuron, 2 kb of the gpa-4 promoter was inserted upstream of human caspase in the pV32 plasmid (a kind gift from V. Maricq) using PstI and KpnI restriction sites. To generate transgenic animals, daf-2(e1368) worms were injected with pPV32 gpa-4p::ICE (30ng/µl) and a myo-2p::GFP coinjection marker (5 ng/µl), and a daf-2(e1368);jluEx122(gpa-4p::ICE; myo-2p::GFP) stable line was identified through myo-2p::GFP expression.
Dauer assays
Dauer assays were performed as previously described (Held et al. 2006). Compounds were resuspended in DMSO to a final concentration of 20 mM. For dose range experiments, serial dilutions were made to yield 10, 5, 2, 1, and 0.5 mM. 15 µL of each working solution of compound were added to 135 µL of water before being spotted onto a 4 mL NGM plate. Equal distribution of the compound throughout the agar was assumed to yield final concentrations of 50, 25, 10, 5, and 2.5 µM.
For the dauer shift assay, eggs from a synchronous lay were transferred to plates containing DMSO and placed at 25°. At different time intervals after the lay, worms were removed from the incubator and transferred to plates containing AM251 and returned to the incubator as quickly as possible. Two separate lays were performed, one in the morning and one in the evening such that one lay would yield the 24 hr and 30 hr time points and the other lay would yield the 12 hr and 18 hr time points. For glucose assays, glucose was added to the molten NGM prior to pouring plates and dauer assays performed as described above.
SER-5/β-arrestin2 recruitment assay
C. elegans ser-5 cDNA was amplified with a 5′ XhoI and a 3′ KpnI site and cloned into pCMV HA-N (Clontech). The β-arrestin2 recruitment assay was performed as previously described (Barak et al. 1997, Johnson et al. 2003). Briefly, HEK cells were transfected with HA-ser-5 (5 μg) and mouse β-arrestin2-EGFP (2 μg) using the Gene Pulser Xcell electroporation system (Bio-Rad). After transfection, cells were plated on collagen-coated glass-bottom dishes and incubated overnight. Cells were then serum starved in Opti-MEM media without phenol red for 60 min. An Olympus FluoView 1000 confocal microscope was used to image β-arrestin2-EGFP translocation in live cells. Single focal plane images were captured using 100X objective after serum starvation for basal activity, and between 5 and 60 min after drug treatment. To ensure cells that were not stimulated by AM251 were able to respond to drug treatment, cells were treated with 10 μM serotonin after AM251 treatment.
Statistical analysis
The percentages of dauers and nondauers were calculated for each trial, and trials set up on different days were deemed to be biological replicates. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism. Data are presented as mean + sd and were analyzed by Student’s t-test for k = 2 groups or one-way ANOVA for k ≥ 3 groups with Sidak’s multiple comparisons test for pairwise comparisons.
Data availability
All strains and vectors generated are available upon request. All data necessary for confirming the conclusions presented in the article are available in Supplementary Material, File S1.
Results
The CB receptor antagonist AM251 suppresses dauer formation in C. elegans
To identify lipid signaling molecules that suppress dauer entry in C. elegans, we screened the Bioactive Lipid Library (Enzo Life Sciences) in a daf-2(e1371) mutant background at 25°. Of the 204 compounds screened, only one compound, AM251 (Figure 1A), robustly promoted growth of daf-2 mutants to the gravid adult stage under dauer-inducing conditions. To confirm the activity of AM251, we carried out dose response experiments and found that this molecule reproducibly promoted growth of daf-2 mutants to adulthood in a dose-dependent manner, with 5 µM AM251 sufficient to rescue almost 100% of animals (Figure 1B).
AM251 acts early in development to promote reproductive growth
To examine the timing requirement for AM251, daf-2(e1368) animals from a synchronous egg lay were raised at 25° on plates containing DMSO vehicle (dauer-inducing conditions) and transferred to plates containing AM251 at different time points. Worms that were transferred to AM251 at 12 hr or 18 hr after the egg lay developed into adult, nondauer animals in the same way as the AM251 control (Figure 1C). However, worms that were transferred from DMSO to AM251 at 24 hr and 30 hr after the egg lay continued to develop into dauers, as did animals that were only exposed to DMSO. Conversely, worms raised on AM251 and shifted to DMSO at 12 hr or 18 hr after the egg lay developed into dauers in the same way as the DMSO control (Figure 1D), but worms that were transferred from AM251 to DMSO at 24 hr and 30 hr after the egg lay developed into reproductive adults, as did animals that were only exposed to AM251. These data show that AM251 exposure in late L1/early L2 is required and sufficient to promote reproductive growth. In addition, the failure of AM251 to promote reproductive growth in animals shifted after 24 hr suggests that it cannot alter the fate of L2d/predauer animals.
AM251 activity is augmented by glucose supplementation
Supplementation with glucose has been shown to rescue the Daf-c phenotype of daf-2 mutants at semipermissive temperatures (Lee et al. 2009, Mondoux et al. 2011), via a mechanism that involves O-linked-N-acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNac) cycling (Forsythe et al. 2006, Hanover et al. 2005, Lee et al. 2010). We therefore asked whether AM251 promotes reproductive growth via a similar mechanism. At the restrictive temperature of 25°, exposure to 100 mM D-glucose promoted reproductive growth in only 10% of animals (Figure 2A). Under these conditions, 5 µM AM251 alone resulted in approximately 70% rescue, with lower doses showing very little effect (Figure 2A). However, combined exposure to glucose and AM251 resulted in a dose-dependent, synergistic increase in the number of nondauer animals (Figure 2A). This effect required metabolism of glucose, since in the presence of L-glucose, which cannot be metabolized, there was no additional effect over that of AM251 alone (Figure 2B). Loss of function mutations in the O-GlcNac transferase ogt-1 lead to decreased O-GlcNacylation of proteins and diminished the ability of glucose to suppress dauer formation in daf-2 mutants (Mondoux et al. 2011). However, AM251 was still able to rescue dauer formation in a daf-2; ogt-1 mutant background (Figure 2C). Collectively, these data suggest that AM251 and glucose promote reproductive growth via parallel mechanisms, and also indicate that the activity of AM251 is influenced by the metabolic status of the animal.
Neuronal AMPK activity inhibits the effects of AM251
The AMP regulated kinase, AMPK, is an important sensor of cellular energy levels and an increase in the AMP to ATP ratio arising from low nutrition results in phosphorylation and activation of AMPK (Hardie 2011). In C. elegans, loss of function mutations in one of the AMPK α subunits, aak-2, behave like AM251 treatment and suppress dauer entry in daf-2 mutants at 25° (Apfeld et al. 2004). Thus, we reasoned that if AM251 was inhibiting AMPK activity, there should be no further suppression of the Daf-c phenotype in daf-2; aak-2 mutants treated with AM251. Contrary to this, we found that AM251 was fully effective in promoting reproductive growth in daf-2(e1368); aak-2(ok524) double mutants at 26.5° (Figure 3A). This suggests that AM251 is not acting via inhibition of AAK-2, but rather that AAK-2 activity may limit the dauer rescuing activity of this molecule.
If wild-type AMPK activity limits the effectiveness of AM251, we reasoned that constitutively active AAK-2 should further inhibit the ability of AM251 to suppress dauer formation. We therefore introduced a constitutively active version of AMPK, aak-2(CA) (Mair et al. 2011), into the daf-2 mutant background and asked whether AM251 was still able to suppress dauer formation. There was no increase in the basal level of dauer formation in the daf-2; aak-2(CA) animals, and while they did respond to AM251 in a dose-dependent manner, there was a significant reduction in the magnitude of the response compared with daf-2 controls (Figure 3B). These data show that constitutive activation of AMPK inhibits the ability of AM251 to suppress dauer formation by a parallel mechanism.
To determine where AAK-2(CA) acts to inhibit AM251, we expressed it in different tissues and examined the ability of AM251 to suppress dauer entry in daf-2 mutants. AM251 was still able to suppress dauer formation in daf-2 mutants with activated AMPK in either the intestine or in body wall muscle, but was unable to promote reproductive growth to the same extent when AMPK was activated in neurons (Figure 3C). These data indicate that AAK-2 activity in neuronal tissues antagonizes the growth promoting activity of AM251 and are consistent with AM251 acting through a neuronal mechanism to inhibit dauer formation.
AM251 acts via TGF-β signaling and insulin peptides in the ASI neuron
Laser ablation studies have identified a number of sensory neurons that are involved in dauer entry and exit (Bargmann and Horvitz 1991). Of these, the ASI neuron plays a major role in promoting reproductive growth and inhibiting dauer entry, with a lesser role for the ASJ neuron (Bargmann and Horvitz 1991), and thus ASI is a strong candidate for mediating the effects of AM251. Therefore, we examined dauer entry in response to AM251 in daf-2 mutants in which either the ASI or ASJ neuron was ablated through tissue specific expression of a cytotoxic caspase (Cornils et al. 2011). Ablation of the ASI neuron strongly reduced the ability of AM251 to promote reproductive growth (Figure 4A), but loss of the ASJ neuron had no effect (Figure 4B). These data show that the effect of AM251 in suppressing dauer entry is mediated via the ASI neuron.
The ASI neuron promotes reproductive growth via the secretion of the TGF-β ligand DAF-7 (Ren et al. 1996), as well as insulin peptides, such as DAF-28 (Li et al. 2003) and INS-6 (Cornils et al. 2011). We therefore tested if AM251 was acting through these pathways to promote reproductive growth. We found that AM251 did not rescue dauer formation in daf-7 mutants, which lack a TGF-β ligand, nor did it have any effect on daf-4 mutants, which have a defective TGF-β receptor (Figure 4C). These data show that AM251 requires a functional TGF-β signaling pathway for its effect on dauer formation. We also tested the requirement for daf-28 and ins-6 because they are expressed early in larval development (Baugh et al. 2011) and both have previously been implicated in dauer formation (Li et al. 2003, Cornils et al. 2011). AM251 was able to suppress dauer formation in ins-6(tm2416); daf-2(e1371) and daf-2(e1371); daf-28(tm2308) double mutants at 25°, although the response was significantly reduced compared with daf-2 alone and was more pronounced in the daf-2; daf-28 double mutant (Figure 4D). These data are consistent with the assertion that daf-28 is more important than ins-6 in promoting reproductive growth (Cornils et al. 2011), but suggest that AM251 influences secretion of both insulins. AM251 also failed to promote reproductive growth in an ins-6(tm2416);daf-2(e1371);daf-28(tm2308) triple mutant, but we were concerned that the strong Daf-c phenotype (∼95% dauers at 15°) would obscure the interpretation of dependency (data not shown). We therefore examined whether AM251 could prevent dauer formation in an ins-6; daf-28 double mutant in the presence of a wild-type daf-2 receptor. ins-6(tm2416); daf-28(tm2308) double mutants are Daf-c at 27° (Cornils et al. 2011), and we found that AM251 was unable to rescue the Daf-c phenotype of the double mutant at either fully restrictive or semipermissive temperatures (Figure 4E). This result suggests that insulin peptide secretion after exposure to AM251 is required for promoting reproductive growth. To further test this, we evaluated the effect of AM251 in unc-31 mutants that lack a calcium activated protein for secretion (CAPS) homolog that is required for DAF-7 and insulin secretion via dense core vesicle docking (DCV) (Ailion et al. 1999, Speese et al. 2007). Consistent with a neurosecretory mechanism, we found that AM251 had no effect on the Daf-c phenotype of unc-31 mutants at 27° (Figure 4F).
G-protein signaling mediates the effects of AM251 on dauer formation
The guanylyl cyclase DAF-11 is expressed in the ASI neuron and has been shown to be required for both TGF-β and insulin peptide expression (Li et al. 2003, Murakami et al. 2001). AM251 was not able to promote reproductive growth in daf-11 mutants (Figure 5A), suggesting that it requires functional DAF-11 to promote secretion of neuropeptides from the ASI neuron. Since daf-11 is hypothesized to work downstream of GPCR signaling (Birnby et al. 2000, Bargmann 2006), we tested if G-protein subunits are required for the effects of AM251. We focused on those G-proteins that are expressed in the ASI neuron, and crossed mutants into the daf-2(e1368) background to evaluate their effects on the ability of AM251 to suppress dauer formation. Of the seven G-proteins tested, we found that only gpa-3 is partially required for the effects of AM251 (Figure 5B). This indicates that gpa-3 is functioning upstream of TGF-β and insulin secretion and impacts the ability of AM251 to promote reproductive growth.
AM251 requires the serotonin receptor ser-5 to suppress dauer formation
As C. elegans lacks orthologs of CB receptors (McPartland 2004, McPartland et al. 2006), it is likely that AM251 acts through another receptor type to influence dauer formation. We considered the serotonin receptor ortholog ser-5 to be a strong candidate, as a previous study had shown that ser-5 influences dauer exit by modulating AMPK activity and dense core vesicle secretion (Cunningham et al. 2014). Consistent with a requirement for ser-5, we found that AM251 was unable to promote reproductive growth in ser-5;daf-2 double mutants (Figure 5C). Interestingly, we found that AM251 was able to fully rescue dauer formation in tph-1;daf-2 double mutants, which lack the ability to synthesize serotonin (Figure 5C). This suggests that AM251 is not acting through SER-5 by simply modulating the availability of its ligand.
To directly test whether AM251 had functional activity at SER-5, we employed a β-arrestin2 translocation assay in HEK-293T cells (Barak et al. 1997, Johnson et al. 2003). We coexpressed HA-tagged SER-5 and mouse β-arrestin2 fused to EGFP, in order to ask if AM251 was able to elicit β-arrestin2 recruitment to the cell surface. As a positive control we treated cells with 10 μM 5-HT, and observed the formation of β-arrestin2-EGFP puncta close to the cell membrane, demonstrating that 5-HT is an agonist of SER-5 (Figure 5, D and E). In addition, HA staining of HA-SER-5 transfected cells revealed an increase in internalized SER-5 after serotonin treatment providing further evidence that 5-HT is an agonist at SER-5. Treatment with 10 μM AM251, however, had no effect on the localization of β-arrestin2-EGFP, indicating that AM251 is not an agonist at SER-5. Moreover, AM251 was not able to reverse 5-HT stimulated β-arrestin2-EGFP recruitment, nor was it able to block subsequent 5-HT activity, demonstrating that AM251 is also not an antagonist at SER-5. Together, these data suggest that AM251 does not have functional activity at SER-5.
Multiple CB receptor ligands modulate dauer formation
Although it is likely that AM251 acts through a non-CB receptor mechanism, it also remains a possibility that worms possess a functional ortholog of CB receptors. In support of this latter hypothesis, we found that a number of other CB receptor antagonists were capable of suppressing dauer formation in daf-2 mutants. These include the silent CB1 antagonist LH21 (Jagerovic et al. 2004), the selective CB2 antagonist AM630 (Ross et al. 1999), as well as the mixed central CB1 receptor antagonist/peripheral CB2 agonist URB447 (LoVerme et al. 2009) (Figure 6, A–C). We also examined a number of CB receptor agonists for their ability to inhibit the actions of AM251 in suppressing dauer formation. Worms were exposed to increasing concentrations of the agonists in the presence of 2.5 µM AM251, a dose that is capable of rescuing dauer formation in the majority of animals. O-2545, a water soluble analog of the main psychoactive component of cannabis, Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol, and a nonselective CB1/2 receptor agonist (Martin et al. 2006), was able to potently suppress AM251-mediated reproductive growth (Figure 6D). The CB2 receptor agonist GP1a (Murineddu et al. 2006) was also able to block the effects of AM251 to a lesser extent (Figure 6E), while another nonselective CB1/2 receptor agonist, CP55,940 (Pertwee 1999), had no effect (Figure 6F).
The ability of O-2545 to prevent the effects of AM251 led us to further examine whether it was able to induce dauer formation when administered alone. We found that at the semipermissive temperature of 23.6°, O-2545 did indeed induce a significant number of dauers at 10 µM and 25 µM, while at higher concentrations it resulted in a significant number of animals that were slow growing or arrested in the early larval stages (Figure 6G). The ability of O-2545 to induce dauer formation did not require srbc-64 or srbc-66, suggesting that this CB receptor agonist was not acting via these ascaroside receptors (Figure 6H).
Discussion
We screened a small library of bioactive lipids and identified the synthetic mammalian CB1 receptor inverse agonist/antagonist AM251 as a robust modifier of dauer formation in the worm. CB receptor antagonists were developed as an antiobesity therapy, with the hypothesis that inhibition of the CB receptor in the central nervous system would decrease feeding and thus lead to weight loss (Carai et al. 2005). One such compound is Rimonabant, a closely-related analog of AM251, which we also found to suppress dauer formation in worms, to the same extent as AM251 (data not shown). In clinical trials, the degree to which Rimonabant promoted weight loss and the extent of its beneficial effects on lipid profiles suggested that its mechanism went beyond the central inhibition of food intake (Scheen 2008). There is now evidence that CBs influence glucose homeostasis and insulin sensitivity, independently of their effects in the central nervous system (Juan-Pico et al. 2006, Nogueiras et al. 2009).
We have generated a number of lines of evidence that suggest that AM251 also elicits changes in insulin sensitivity in C. elegans, which leads to suppression of dauer entry. First, AM251 activity required the presence of the insulin peptides daf-28 and ins-6, as well as unc-31, which encodes a protein that is required for dense core vesicle docking and neuropeptide secretion. The daf-2(e1368) and daf-2(e1371) mutations that we used in this study are hypomorphic and alter single amino acid residues in the extracellular, ligand binding domain of daf-2 (Patel et al. 2008). Thus, it is likely that these mutants have altered affinity for insulin peptides, and, consequently, their temperature sensitive Daf-c phenotypes could be overcome by increases in insulin peptide availability. Although AM251 also required the TGF-β ligand daf-7, this could be a consequence of daf-7 mutants being functionally deficient in insulin signaling, rather than a direct action of AM251 on TGF-β signaling, since daf-7 mutations lead to down-regulation of many components of the insulin signaling pathway (Liu et al. 2004). Second, AM251 required an intact ASI neuron, but was not affected by ablation of the ASJ neuron. ASI is known to be important for promoting reproductive growth (Bargmann and Horvitz 1991) and expresses DAF-7, DAF-28, and INS-6 during development (Ren et al. 1996, Li et al. 2003, Cornils et al. 2011). Third, timing experiments indicated that AM251 exposure early in development was sufficient to promote reproductive growth. These data recapitulate the temperature shift experiments of Swanson and Riddle (Swanson and Riddle 1981), that originally defined the dauer decision window and indicate that AM251 acts in late L1/early L2. Importantly, this is also the time at which daf-28 and ins-6 expression peak during development (Baugh et al. 2011).
The synergistic interaction between AM251 and glucose in modifying dauer formation is also consistent with AM251 affecting insulin sensitivity. Glucose supplementation prevents dauer entry only under semipermissive conditions (Lee et al. 2009, Mondoux et al. 2011), and one interpretation of this is that under these conditions there is enough residual insulin signaling to generate ATP when more glucose becomes available. However, under fully restrictive conditions, insulin signaling drops below a threshold and metabolism is shifted away from energy utilization to energy storage (Braeckman et al. 2009). In this situation, the addition of supplemental glucose results in increased energy storage and has no effect in promoting reproductive growth. Thus, at low doses, where AM251 alone is not able to increase insulin signaling sufficiently to prevent dauer entry, the addition of glucose provides additional substrate to drive catabolism and energy production beyond a threshold that is sufficient to support reproductive growth.
Further evidence that AM251 activity is influenced by the metabolic status of the animal comes from its interaction with AMPK signaling. Loss of function mutations in the aak-2 subunit behave like AM251 in that they suppress dauer formation in daf-2 mutants (Apfeld et al. 2004). Although epistasis analysis indicated that AM251 does not require AMPK for its activity, we did find that constitutive activation of aak-2 in neurons was able to block AM251 signaling. This suggests that the AM251 signaling cascade acts in parallel to energy sensing by AMPK. In mammals, AMPK activity influences insulin secretion from pancreatic β-cells in a number of ways, including glucose metabolism, K+/ATP channel trafficking, insulin granule docking, and insulin gene transcription (Fu et al. 2013). Thus, the effect of AMPK activity on AM251 function may be via its effects on insulin peptide transcription and/or insulin secretion, rather than directly inhibition of AM251 signaling pathways.
The dependence on daf-7, ins-6, and daf-28 also support the idea that the ASI sensory neuron is a target tissue of AM251. However, whether this is mediated through a direct interaction with a receptor expressed on this neuron or indirectly by acting on another neuron, which in turn influences ASI activity, remains to be determined. AM251 also required the activity of the guanylyl cyclase DAF-11, which is expressed in a subset of amphid sensory neurons, including ASI (Birnby et al. 2000), and is thought to function downstream of chemosensory G-protein coupled receptors (Bargmann 2006). In the absence of CB receptor orthologs, we considered the serotonin receptor SER-5 to be a good candidate for an AM251 target, principally because SER-5 had been shown to act in the ASI neuron to influence dauer exit by modulating AMPK activity and dense core vesicle secretion (Cunningham et al. 2014). Genetic experiments indicated that ser-5 was indeed required for the activity of AM251 but, intriguingly, AM251 did not require the activity of tph-1, which is required for serotonin synthesis (Sze et al. 2000). This suggests that AM251 is not acting to modulate serotonin availability at the SER-5 receptor and raised the possibility that it could directly interact with SER-5. This hypothesis, however, was not supported by molecular pharmacology studies. A β-arrestin2 translocation assay, failed to reveal functional affinity for AM251 and the worm SER-5 receptor. β-arrestin2 acts as a signaling scaffold for many GPCRs (Orgel 1963) and the translocation assay provides a means of determining whether a ligand acts through a target receptor without any knowledge of the subset of G-proteins that are required (Peters et al. 2012). Importantly, we were able to demonstrate that 5-HT treatment of cells transfected with HA-SER-5 does lead to β-arrestin2-EGFP being translocated to the cell surface and internalization of the receptor, providing direct evidence that 5-HT does activate SER-5. Unfortunately, we were not able to observe any effect of AM251 alone on β-arrestin2-EGP recruitment, nor did we see any evidence that AM251 could compete with 5-HT. Taken together, these data suggest that AM251 might be either functioning upstream of SER-5 by altering the levels of a non-5-HT-like ligand or, alternatively, that AM251 acts on a different receptor target that interacts with the SER-5 receptor. In this respect, it is noteworthy that the mammalian CB1 receptor has been shown to form heteromers with 5-HT2A receptors (Vinals et al. 2015).
Although we have yet to identify the molecular target of AM251 in the worm, our data support a model in which AM251 acts upstream of SER-5 and requires TGF-β and insulin peptides in the ASI neuron to promote reproductive growth programs throughout the whole animal. By screening a subset of nematode G-protein mutants, we found that gpa-3 is required for the effects of AM251, supporting the idea that a GPCR signaling is being targeted. Kim et al. (2009) have shown that gpa-3 mutants are insensitive to ascaroside-induced dauer entry, perhaps suggesting that AM251 is antagonizing a component of the system that is involved in dauer formation in response to ascarosides (Kim et al. 2009). However, the CB receptor agonist O-2545, which inhibited the effects of AM251 and also promoted dauer formation when administered alone, was still capable of inducing dauer entry in the absence of srbc-64 and srbc-66, two GPCRs that have been shown to mediate the effects of ascarosides on dauer formation in a gpa-3 dependent manner (Kim et al. 2009). Although other ascaroside receptors exist, these data suggest that synthetic CBs are probably not acting directly on dauer pheromone signaling pathways to modify the dauer decision.
AM251 was developed as a specific antagonist of the mammalian CB1 receptor, but it has since become clear that synthetic CBs are somewhat promiscuous in terms of the receptor subtypes through which they mediate their biological effects (Pertwee et al. 2010). As such, AM251 has also been shown to act on multiple targets, including GPR55, T-type calcium channels, voltage gated sodium channels, as well as PPAR α and γ (Pertwee et al. 2010). Thus, it is perhaps not surprising to find that AM251 has potent biological effects in an organism that lacks canonical CB receptors (McPartland et al. 2006), but is replete with other possible receptor targets that have human homologs (Shaye and Greenwald 2011). However, it is intriguing that other, structurally unrelated CB receptor antagonists also suppressed dauer entry, while CB receptor agonists not only inhibited the effects of AM251, but one of them was able to elicit the opposite phenotype and promote dauer entry when administered alone. Of the antagonists, the CB1 specific compounds, AM251 (Lan et al. 1999) and LH21 (Jagerovic et al. 2004), were most potent, followed by the selective CB2 antagonist AM630 (Ross et al. 1999), while the mixed CB1 antagonist/CB2 agonist, URB447 (LoVerme et al. 2009), showed the weakest effects. Of the nonselective CB1/2 agonists CP55,940 (Pertwee 1999) had no effect, while O-2545 (Martin et al. 2006) showed the greatest potency, and the CB2 receptor agonist GP1a (Murineddu et al. 2006) exhibited a low level of inhibitory activity against AM251. A caveat to interpreting these data are the fact that certain chemical structures accumulate more effectively in the worm than others (Burns et al. 2010), and thus those compounds that show weak effects in the worm may simply be those that are taken up poorly. However, taken together, these observations suggest that, if the CB agonists and antagonists are binding to a common receptor in worms, it appears to share some of the pharmacology of both CB1 and CB2 receptors.
In conclusion, we performed a chemical screen for bioactive lipids that modify the dauer phenotype in C. elegans, and identified a CB receptor antagonist as a potent suppressor of dauer formation. These studies establish the nematode as a genetically tractable model system that is responsive to synthetic CBs, and therefore could be useful in delineating the classical and nonclassical actions of CB-based therapeutics. The fact that a CB1 receptor agonist and antagonist have opposing effects on the same phenotype in C. elegans makes it tempting to speculate that they are acting at a common target. In this respect, there is evidence for the existence of CB receptors in mammals that are distinct from the canonical CB1 and CB2 receptors (Pertwee et al. 2010, Brown 2007). Ultimately, studies aimed at identifying the molecular targets of AM251 and O-2545 in C. elegans will be required to determine whether the effects of these molecules are mediated via non-CB receptor mechanisms, or via an as yet unidentified noncanonical CB receptor.
Acknowledgments
We thank Michael Benedetti, Mark White, and Museer Lone for technical assistance, and members of the Gill Lab, Gordon Lithgow, Pankaj Kapahi, William Ja, and Brock Grill for useful discussions. This study was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant AG036992. Some strains were provided by the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center, which is funded by the NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40 OD010440).
Footnotes
Communicating editor: D. S. Fay
Literature Cited
Bargmann, C. I., 2006 Chemosensation in C. elegans (October 25, 2006), WormBook, ed. The C. elegans Research Community WormBook, doi/10.1895/wormbook.1.123.1, http://www.wormbook.org.
Braeckman, B. P., K. Houthoofd, and J. R. Vanfleteren, 2009 Intermediary metabolism (February 16, 2009), WormBook, ed. The C. elegans Research Community WormBook, doi/10.1895/wormbook.1.146.1, http://www.wormbook.org.
Hu, P. J., 2007 Dauer (August 08, 2007), WormBook, ed. The C. elegans Research Community WormBook, doi/10.1895/wormbook.1.144.1, http://www.wormbook.org.
Ludewig, A. H., and F. C. Schroeder, 2013 Ascaroside signaling in C. elegans (January 18, 2013), WormBook, ed. The C. elegans Research Community WormBook, doi/10.1895/wormbook.1.155.1, http://www.wormbook.org.
Robertson, H. M., and J. H. Thomas, 2006 The putative chemoreceptor families of C. elegans (January 06, 2006), WormBook, ed. The C. elegans Research Community WormBook, doi/10.1895/wormbook.1.66.1, http://www.wormbook.org.
Author notes
Supplemental material is available online at www.g3journal.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1534/g3.116.026997/-/DC1