Targeting of Painting of fourth to roX1 and roX2 Proximal Sites Suggests Evolutionary Links Between Dosage Compensation and the Regulation of the fourth Chromosome in Drosophila melanogaster

In Drosophila melanogaster, two chromosome-specific targeting and regulatory systems have been described. The male-specific lethal (MSL) complex supports dosage compensation by stimulating gene expression from the male X-chromosome, and the protein Painting of fourth (POF) specifically targets and stimulates expression from the heterochromatic 4th chromosome. The targeting sites of both systems are well characterized, but the principles underlying the targeting mechanisms have remained elusive. Here we present an original observation, namely that POF specifically targets two loci on the X-chromosome, PoX1 and PoX2 (POF-on-X). PoX1 and PoX2 are located close to the roX1 and roX2 genes, which encode noncoding RNAs important for the correct targeting and spreading of the MSL-complex. We also found that the targeting of POF to PoX1 and PoX2 is largely dependent on roX expression and identified a high-affinity target region that ectopically recruits POF. The results presented support a model linking the MSL-complex to POF and dosage compensation to regulation of heterochromatin.

The evolution of sex chromosomes, for example the X and Y chromosome pairs found in mammals and flies, makes it more difficult for balanced gene expression to be achieved. Although some genes located on the X-chromosome are expressed in a sex-specific manner, most genes require equal expression in males and females (Vicoso and Bachtrog 2009;Stenberg and Larsson 2011). The gradual degeneration of the proto-Y chromosome causes an increasing requirement to equalize gene expression between a single X (in males) and two X-chromosomes (in females) and to balance this level of expression with that of the two sets of autosomal chromosomes (Oliver 2007;Vicoso and Bachtrog 2009;Prestel et al. 2010a;Stenberg and Larsson 2011). This requirement has led to the evolution of dosage-compensation mechanisms. Such mechanisms must equalize the transcriptional activities of the two X-chromosomes in the homogametic sex with that of the single Xchromosome in the heterogametic sex, as well as balancing the relative expression levels between sex chromosomes and autosomes (Gupta et al. 2006;Nguyen and Disteche 2006;Deng et al. 2011). In fruit flies, both these requirements are solved by a 2-fold increase in gene expression that is restricted to the single male X-chromosome. This 2-fold increase is the result of a combination of a general buffering effect exerted on monosomic regions or chromosomes (Stenberg et al. 2009;Zhang et al. 2010;Lundberg et al. 2012) and an increase in expression from the male X-chromosome mediated by the male-specific lethal (MSL) complex (Hamada et al. 2005;Prestel et al. 2010a;Stenberg and Larsson 2011). The MSL-complex consists of two partly redundant noncoding RNAs, roX1 and roX2, together with at least five MSL proteins (MSL1, MSL2, MSL3, MLE, and MOF) that "paint" the dosage-compensated male X-chromosome. MOF mediates acetylation of H4 at lysine 16 (H4K16ac), and enrichment for H4K16ac on the male X-chromosome is believed to cause decondensation of the chro-matin fiber, which at least partly explains the hypertranscription of this chromosome (Gelbart and Kuroda 2009;Prestel et al. 2010a). The MSLcomplex not only recruits MOF to the male X-chromosome but also constrains the activation potential of MOF (Prestel et al. 2010b;Sun et al. 2013). The male specificity of the MSL-complex is accomplished by the MSL2 protein, which is only formed in males and is rate limiting for the formation of the complex (Kelley et al. 1995(Kelley et al. , 1997Bashaw and Baker 1997).
Understanding how the MSL-complex correctly targets the~1000 active genes on the male X-chromosome is a key challenge in this area of research; targeting is currently thought to be initiated by sequencedependent binding of the complex to 1002200 nucleation sites on the X-chromosome, which are termed chromatin entry sites (CES) or high-affinity sites (HAS) (Alekseyenko et al. 2008;Straub et al. 2008Straub et al. , 2013. Two of the strongest nucleation sites are the roX1 and roX2 loci (Kelley et al. 1999). Targeting to nucleation sites is followed by spreading to neighboring genes; this is dependent on active transcription (Sass et al. 2003;Larschan et al. 2007), MSL-complex concentration (Dahlsveen et al. 2006), level of affinity (Straub et al. 2008;Lucchesi 2009), and probably also sequence composition .
However, the dosage compensation mediated by the MSL-complex is not the only chromosome-wide compensatory mechanism that has been described in Drosophila. There is also the protein Painting of fourth (POF), which in Drosophila melanogaster specifically targets the 4 th chromosome (Larsson et al. 2001;Johansson et al. 2007aJohansson et al. , 2012. POF binds to nascent RNA from actively transcribed genes on the 4 th chromosome and increases levels of expression of these genes (Johansson et al. 2012). The compensation mediated by POF is sufficient to allow survival of haplo-4 flies (Johansson et al. 2007a). The specific targeting of POF to the 4 th chromosome, the evolutionary connections between the 4 th chromosome, the male X-chromosome and dosage compensation, and the stimulatory effect of POF on gene expression all support the hypothesis that POF originates from a dosage compensatory system (Larsson et al. 2001(Larsson et al. , 2004Larsson and Meller 2006;Johansson et al. 2007a,b;Stenberg et al. 2009;Stenberg and Larsson 2011). Although dosage compensation has probably been required, and thus evolved, on a gene-by-gene or block-of-genes basis, the existence of systems like the MSL-complex that act across a whole chromosome argues that some of the functions were pre-existing and were recruited to compensate the X-chromosome as the proto-Y chromosome started to degenerate . The targeting mechanisms of these systems and the relationship between them are therefore important issues to study in order to understand chromosome evolution and how balanced genome expression is established.
Here we provide a further link between these two chromosomewide targeting systems by exploring an original observation that POF targets two loci on the X-chromosome in a female-specific context. The targeting of these loci depends on roX expression, and by constructing transgenes and examining their effects we have identified a POF highaffinity recruitment element.

Transgenic flies
To generate the P[w + SelG CG1840] transgene, a genomic fragment was amplified with Long PCR Enzyme Mix (Thermo Scientific) using the primers 59-GTGGATCCAAAAATGGTCTTGTTCCACA-39, 59-CGGCGGCCGCAATTTGGCGGAAGATTCAAA-39 with Oregon R genomic DNA as a template. Thus, the fragment included both the SelG gene and the CG1840 gene as well as 1673-bp fragment upstream of SelG transcription start and 2733 bp downstream of the annotated transcript stop position of CG1840. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) product was cut with BamHI/NotI and ligated into a P[w + attB] vector. The latter, which is a pBluescript-based plasmid supplemented with an attB recombination site and a mini-white marker gene, was provided by M. Savitsky. Embryo microinjection into the Bl9750 strain was performed by BestGene (Inc).
The slides were then hybridized using a digoxigenin labeled antisense RNA probe against RE64691 mixed with hybridization mixture in a wet chamber at 42°overnight. After hybridization the slides were washed in 2· SSC at room temperature for 1 min followed by 2· 30 min in 50% formamide, 5· SSC, 10 mM dithiothreitol at 42°, 2· 30 min in 2· SSC at 42°, 1 hr in 0.1· SSC at room temperature, and finally 10 min in PBT at room temperature. The slides were transferred to blocking solution (PBS, 1% Roche blocking reagent) and incubated for 30 min at room temperature, then incubated for 1 hr at room temperature with primary antibody raised against POF (1:500 dilution) and sheep antidigoxigenin (0.4 mg/mL; Roche). The slides were then washed for 3· 2 minutes in PBS + 0.2% Tween-20 at room temperature. They were incubated in the secondary antibodies donkey antirabbit and donkey antisheep conjugated with AlexaFluor555 or AlexaFluor488 (Molecular Probes; diluted 1:500), together with DAPI (5 mg/mL), for 1 hr at room temperature. Finally, the slides were washed for 4· 5 min in PBS + 0.2% Tween-20 and mounted with Vectashield (Vector).

Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) and microarray analysis
For the POF ChIP-chip experiment, we dissected salivary glands from third instar larvae. The ChIP experiment was conducted as previously described (Johansson et al. 2007a,b) using 3 mL of anti-POF (Larsson et al. 2004) for precipitation. The purified ChIP and input DNA samples were amplified using a WGA2 GenomePlex Complete wholegenome amplification kit (Sigma-Aldrich) according to the recommendations of the supplier, and the amplified DNA was purified with a QIAquick PCR purification kit (QIAGEN). To verify that no amplification bias affected the enrichment profiles, we analyzed the ChIP DNA/input DNA ratio before and after amplification by using realtime PCR as previously described (Johansson et al. 2007b).
For tiling array analysis, the amplified ChIP DNA samples were fragmented, labeled, and hybridized to an Affymetrix Drosophila Genome 2.0 array. The signal intensity data generated were analyzed with Affymetrix Tiling Analysis Software (v. 1.1.02), using a 200-bp bandwidth as a smoothing parameter and setting a constraint of perfect match only. The enrichment profiles were produced as ChIP DNA/ input DNA ratios expressed on a log 2 scale. The complete data set is available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/ (accession: GSE45402). The occupancy profiles obtained were visualized and analyzed using Integrated Genome Browser (7.0.1) (Nicol et al. 2009).

Gene identification
To verify the presence of a novel gene between the two genes Mnt and Rala, we sequenced the Expressed Sequence Tag clone RE64691 obtained from the Drosophila Genomics Resource Centre. To determine the 59and 39-ends of the putative novel gene, we isolated poly(A) + RNA from adult females using Dynabeads Oligo (dT) 25 magnetic beads (Invitrogen) as previously described (Svensson et al. 2003) and verified the end sequences using the SMART-RACE cDNA-amplification kit (Clontech) according to a protocol provided by the supplier. The primers used were: RE64691 gene specific primer 1: 59-CAGAAATCGAGTGACACACA CAGG-39, and primer 2: 59-GCTAACATAAGCCCACATCCACAC-39, the nested gene specific primer 1: 59-ACTATAAGTCCCCCGTGATGA CAG-39 and the nested primer 2: 59-GCAGATGGAGACGGAAAGAG TAGG-39.

RESULTS
POF binds to two loci, PoX1 and PoX2, on the X-chromosome in females We have previously shown that POF binds with high specificity to the 4 th chromosome in both males and females (Larsson et al. 2001;Johansson et al. 2007a,b;Figueiredo et al. 2012). With improved techniques for preparation and staining, we noticed that in good chromosome preparations from wild-type larvae two strong POF binding signals were visible on the X-chromosome. By sexing larvae we found that, out of the best 10215 nuclei (fully polytenized and well spread) from each pair of salivary glands, 30250% of all X-chromosomes in females showed one or two reproducible stained bands at cytological locations X:3E and X:10E2F (Figure 1). These bands were never detected in males. We named these loci PoX1 and PoX2 (POF-on-X) and found spreading of the POF binding in both loci (Figure 1 and Figure 2A). The presence and degree of spreading differed between nuclei, and we typically saw 1-3 bands decorated by POF in both PoX1 and PoX2. In addition to the two loci on the X-chromosome, we occasionally observed POF binding in parts of the 2L:31 region in both males and females ( Figure 1) (Lundberg et al. 2013).
PoX1 and PoX2 correspond to specific genes on the X-chromosome We were intrigued by the fact that the two loci, PoX1 and PoX2, mapped cytologically close to roX1 (X:3F) and roX2 (X:10C) and decided to map these PoX loci more precisely by using ChIP-chip technology. We performed ChIP-chip analysis on chromatin extracts from salivary glands of 3 rd instar larvae. The ChIP-chip profiles generated confirmed the cytological observations ( Figure 2). The PoX1 locus corresponds to a strong binding peak/region~200 kb downstream of roX1 ( Figure 2B). In this region, POF is enriched within the 39end of the Mnt gene and in a distinct 2-kb region between the genes Mnt and Rala ( Figure 2D). The PoX2 locus corresponds to three enriched regions covering the five genes Ck2b, Hsc70-3, CG1578, SelG, and CG1840, which are located~200 kb downstream of roX2 ( Figure  2, C and E). To test whether POF binding enrichment was correlated with enrichment for the MSL-complex, we plotted MOF data generated from salivary glands of males and females, which was available from (Conrad et al. 2012). Some, but not all, genes in the PoX1 and  PoX2 loci that were enriched in POF, also were enriched in MOF (and presumably the MSL-complex) in males. In females, MOF bound to the promoters of Ck2b, SelG and CG1840 in the PoX2 locus (Figure 2, D and E). We conclude that, with respect to pattern of binding to the PoX1 and PoX2 loci, there is no obvious link between POF and the MSL-complex that distinguishes the targeted genes from other X-linked genes.
POF binds to a novel noncoding gene between Mnt and Rala In the PoX1 locus, we found POF to be highly enriched within the 39end of Mnt and in a distinct region downstream of Mnt and Rala, which are transcribed in the opposite direction so that the region is downstream of both genes ( Figure 3A). No gene had previously been annotated in this region, but a large number of expressed sequence tag (EST) cDNA clones are annotated according to the GBrowse genome browser at FlyBase (Tweedie et al. 2009). We sequenced one of these EST clones, RE64691, and confirmed using 59-and 39-RACE (i.e., rapid amplification of cDNA ends) that this EST cDNA clone probably corresponds to a novel gene as illustrated in Figure 3A. The longest putative ORF is 34 amino acids and it is therefore possible that RE64691 corresponds to a novel noncoding gene. Alternatively, RE64691 belongs to the class of genes with short ORFs encoding small bioactive peptides (Frith et al. 2006;Kastenmayer et al. 2006;Hanada et al. 2007) as exemplified by, e.g. the Drosophila gene tarsal-less (Galindo et al. 2007;Kondo et al. 2010).
Anyway, intrigued by the possibility that POF targets a gene encoding a noncoding RNA (ncRNA), and bearing in mind the fact that ncRNAs have been shown to be important for correct targeting of the MSL-complex, we conducted RNA-FISH experiments to probe whether RE64691 RNA was connected to POF targeting of chromosome 4. The RNA-FISH results showed that RE64691 is expressed in salivary glands in both males and females, but no enrichment of RE64691 RNA on the 4 th chromosome was detected (Figure 3, B and C). The detection of RE64691 expression in both males and females indicated that expression per se could not explain the sexspecific targeting of PoX1. We therefore checked expression in salivary gland tissues of the five genes located in PoX2 by using RNA-seq data from (Graveley et al. 2011). The five genes located in PoX2 are expressed at similar levels in males compared to females (results not shown). We conclude that gene expression is not the determinant of the female specific targeting of POF to PoX1 and PoX2 and that RE64691 RNA is not enriched in POF-bound regions outside the RE64691 locus.

POF and HP1a colocalize at PoX loci
We have previously shown that POF and HP1a colocalize within the gene bodies of active genes on the 4 th chromosome (Johansson et al. 2007a,b;Figueiredo et al. 2012). Indeed, no POF binding has been detected without HP1a enrichment. We therefore asked whether the PoX sites, which are bound only in females and not in all individual nuclei, are also targeted by HP1a. We observed that in the cases where POF binds to PoX1 and PoX2, weak but consistent enrichment for HP1a was present (Figure 4). We conclude that POF binding is accompanied by HP1a binding at all POF enriched sites including the female specific PoX1 and PoX2.
POF binding is dependent on roX Several lines of evidence have linked POF to dosage compensation and indicated that it has an evolutionary relationship with the MSLcomplex (reviewed by ). We were therefore fascinated by the close proximity of PoX1 and PoX2 to roX1 and roX2, respectively. We asked whether the targeting by POF to PoX1 and PoX2 depended on roX1 and/or roX2. When we analyzed the best 10215 nuclei in each chromosome preparation (fully polytenized chromosomes with a well spread X-chromosome from one pair of glands), 30-50% of these nuclei showed PoX1 and/or PoX2 targeting by POF (Table 1). Using the same criteria, we found, to our surprise, almost no POF targeting to PoX1 or PoX2 in roX1-or roX1 roX2mutant female larvae (Table 1). Thus, the extent of POF targeting to PoX loci is dependent on roX; however, it does not require roX because in all roX mutant backgrounds tested we found individual nuclei (,5%) with clear targeting. Furthermore, overexpression of roX2 (but not roX1) in females using roX transgenes under a hsp83 promoter increased the targeting frequency. In contrast, expression of a partial MSL-complex in females decreased the targeting frequency (Table 1). We conclude that POF targeting to PoX loci in females is affected by but does not require roX.

Minimal POF recruitment element
In contrast to the targeting of the MSL-complex, no high-affinity sites have previously been identified for POF binding. If the entire polytenized region of the 4 th chromosome (~1.2 Mb) is translocated, it will not recruit POF if not under "heterochromatic pressure" (Johansson et al. 2007a). The PoX1 and PoX2 regions were therefore of interest as nonheterochromatic targets for POF binding, and we decided to dissect these regions further. First we tested the following duplications of the PoX1 and PoX2 loci: Dp(1;3)DC112 (92 kb covering PoX1), Dp(1;3)DC244 (87 kb covering the three genes Ck2b, Hsc70-3, CG1578 in PoX2), and Dp(1;3)DC246 (102 kb covering the two genes SelG and CG1840 in PoX2). These three duplications are all inserted in the same attP docking site in genomic region 3L:65B2 (Venken et al. 2010). Importantly, these duplications do not include roX1 or roX2 and will therefore reveal whether proximity to roX genes is required for targeting. In two of these duplications, DC112 and DC246, POF clearly targeted the duplicated regions at frequencies similar to those of the endogenous loci (30250%). In contrast, in Dp(1;3)DC244, POF was not targeted to the duplicated region. In agreement with its behavior towards the endogenous loci, POF targeting to DC112 and DC246 was also to a large extent dependent on roX, i.e., POF was targeted to the duplicated region in ,5% of nuclei in both roX1 roX2; Dp(1;3)DC112 and roX1 roX2; Dp(1;3)DC246 females (Table 1). To narrow down the region further, we tested flies transgenic for single genes or small regions. A 6-kb transgene including the genomic region covering the Ck2b gene, which has previously been described (Jauch et al. 2002), was tested for POF targeting. No targeting to the P[w + CkIIb gDNA] transgenic locus was detected, a result consistent with the lack of targeting in the duplication Dp(1;3)DC244, which covers Ck2b. We next cloned and generated transgenic flies with a 6-kb genomic region including the SelG and CG1840 genes targeted by POF in the PoX2 locus and in Dp(1;3)DC246 ( Figure 5A). In P[w + SelG CG1840] females we observed consistently strong targeting to the transgenic insert ( Figure 5B). The targeting appears stronger than that at the endogenous site, since targeting is seen both in males and females and at a higher frequency (.50%) than that to the endogenous PoX loci (Table 1).
Furthermore, targeting of POF to P[w + SelG CG1840] in males was not abolished in the roX1 roX2 mutant background. In agreement with findings that we have previously reported for the 4 th chromosome (Lundberg et al. 2013), POF and Setdb1 also colocalize on PoX loci and on the targeted P[w + SelG CG1840] transgene ( Figure 5B). We conclude that the 6-kb region inserted in P[w + SelG CG1840] is a uniquely strong high-affinity recruitment site for POF targeting and is targeted independent of the genomic environment. The targeting of POF is also linked to the targeting by Setdb1 and HP1.

DISCUSSION
Two chromosome specific targeting systems have been described in Drosophila melanogaster: the MSL-complex, which specifically targets the male X-chromosome, and POF, which targets the 4 th chromosome in both males and females (Larsson and Meller 2006;Stenberg and Larsson 2011). Both the MSL-complex and POF target active genes and stimulate gene expression. The two systems stimulate gene expression levels to a comparable extent (Hamada et al. 2005;Johansson et al. 2007a;Stenberg et al. 2009;Zhang et al. 2010). High-affinity sites have been characterized for the MSL-complex and there are several published examples of short regions, including the roX1 and roX2 loci, that are capable of recruiting this complex when presented as transgenes (Kelley et al. 1999;Oh et al. 2004;Dahlsveen et al. 2006;Kind and Akhtar 2007;Alekseyenko et al. 2008). In contrast, until now no high-affinity sites for POF targeting have been identified. Translocated 4 th chromosomes will not be targeted by POF, unless the proximal heterochromatic region is present and under conditions that favor heterochromatin formation (Johansson et al. 2007a). The characterization of POF targeting to PoX1 and PoX2 in females thus provides a unique opportunity to study the targeting of POF to a nonheterochromatic target and to further our understanding of the evolution of these two targeting systems.

POF binding to PoX1 and PoX2
Considering the evolutionary relationship between POF and the MSLcomplex, it was intriguing to find POF targeting to two distinct regions on the X-chromosome, i.e., X:3E and X:10E-F. The apparent spreading of POF targeting in these two regions (resembling the spreading of the MSL-complex when it is targeted to roX transgenes) and the close location of these regions to roX1 and roX2 suggested a link with the MSL-complex and dosage compensation. It has been hypothesized that POF originated as a dosage compensation system, since POF targets the male X-chromosome in, for example, D. busckii and Figure 3 POF binds to a novel gene, RE64691, located between Mnt and Rala. (A) High-resolution enrichment profiling at the PoX1 site shows that POF binds to a novel gene (indicated by a red rectangle) represented by the EST clone RE64691. (B and C) Immunostaining combined with RNA-FISH shows that the gene RE64691 is expressed in both females (B) and males (C) but targeted by POF only in females (note that in contrast POF targets the 4 th chromosome in both males and females). The RE64691 locus is indicated by an arrow. The tip of the X-chromosome and the 4 th chromosome from one representative female nucleus are shown in (B) and from one male in (C). The 4 th chromosome is indicated by "Chr4".
D. ananassae and in those species POF colocalizes with H4K16ac and the MSL-complex, respectively (Larsson et al. 2004;Stenberg and Larsson 2011). However, the targeting of POF to endogenous PoX1 and PoX2 in D. melanogaster is restricted to females. This sex-specific targeting is not caused by sex-specific expression of the targeted genes, since comparable expression levels of RE64691 as well as SelG and CG1840 are consistently found in male and female salivary glands.
PoX targeting depends on roX expression Not only are the two targeted loci, PoX1 and PoX2, located in close proximity to roX1 and roX2, the targeting is also largely dependent on roX, because losses of roX1 alone or of roX1 and roX2 cause a clear decrease in the frequency of PoX targeting. Importantly, in all roX mutant conditions tested, we never found a complete loss of POF binding to the PoX sites. Therefore, roX is not absolutely required for PoX targeting but rather it enhances or stabilizes the interaction. The dependence of targeting on roX is not caused by the close proximity of the PoX loci to the corresponding roX loci, because in the duplications tested the PoX1 and PoX2 are located on another chromosome, i.e. chromosome arm 3L, and the roX genes are not included in the duplicated region. Despite this, two of the duplications show targeting by POF, comparable to that to the endogenous loci. Furthermore, targeting to these transgenic regions was found to be largely dependent on roX, which indicates that roX can act in trans to enhance or stabilize POF targeting. The most parsimonious model to explain these observations is that it is the roX ncRNA species that enhance or stabilize targeting of POF to these non-chromosome 4 targets. This model is supported by the fact that roX2 overexpression seems to further increase the frequency of targeting. However, it should be stressed that endogenous roX expression in females is reported to be at very low levels or absent. In females, roX1 RNA has been reported in early embryos but it appears to be lost midway through embryogenesis, whereas in males expression is maintained through adulthood (Meller et al. 1997;Meller 2003). roX2 RNA first appears a few hours after roX1, but only in male embryos (Meller 2003).
Identification of a high-affinity target for POF No high-affinity sites for POF targeting have previously been identified (Johansson et al. 2007a). It therefore came as a surprise to us that a short (6-kb) region from PoX2 functions as a strong ectopic target for POF in both males and females. The nonsex-specific targeting of POF to the P[w + SelG CG1840] transgene, in contrast to Dp(1;3)  DC246 and endogenous PoX, may be explained by a competition of targeting between POF and the MSL-complex in males. This competition will be more pronounced at the endogenous PoX sites and the duplications as these are also targets for the MSL-complex in males. This finding is supported by the fact that on polytene chromosomes, Dp(1;3)DC246 is targeted by MSL-complex in males while the P[w + SelG CG1840] transgene is not targeted (results not shown). A competition in targeting is also supported by the reduction frequency of PoX1 and PoX2 targeting by POF observed in females expressing a partial MSL-complex, i.e. w; P[w + hsp83:msl2] msl3 females (Table  1). It is important to note that the targeting of POF to the P[w + SelG CG1840] transgene was not caused by genomic location of this transgene since the same attP docking site (3L:65B2) was used as for the duplications of the PoX1 and PoX2 loci. The lack of targeting of POF to translocated parts of the 4 th chromosome and the strong targeting to the PoX2 transgene suggest that the PoX regions may be POF targets that are functionally separable from the 4 th chromosome genes. Since both Setdb1 and HP1a are detected on the transgene, it appears likely that POF recruitment leads to, or is connected with, the formation of GREEN (HP1a and H3K9me enriched) chromatin structure (Filion et al. 2010). The targeting of POF to the 4 th chromosome depends on its wellcharacterized heterochromatic nature and on the presence of HP1a and Setdb1. It is therefore important to note that links between the MSL-complex, roX1 and roX2 and heterochromatic regions have been reported previously, though they remain to be understood. It is known that in roX1 roX2 mutant males, the MSL-complex is still detected on the X-chromosome, albeit at a reduced number of sites, but binding is also found in the chromocenter and at a few reproducible sites on the 4 th chromosome (Meller and Rattner 2002;Deng and Meller 2006;Johansson et al. 2011). In contrast to the X-chromosome, where the MSL-complex is believed to stimulate gene expression, loss of roX RNA reduces expression from genes located in the chromocenter and on the 4 th chromosome ). It has been suggested that roX RNAs participate in two distinct regulatory systems, the dosage compensation system and a system for the modulation of heterochromatin ). Although the mechanism by which roX RNAs enhance binding of POF to PoX loci remains elusive, the observation supports a model linking dosage compensation to modulation of heterochromatin. Additional factors supporting a model linking heterochromatin to dosage compensation are the proposed binding of HP1a to the male X-chromosome (de Wit et al. 2005) and the fact that a reduction in the histone H3S10 kinase JIL-1 results in the spreading of heterochromatic markers (such as H3K9me2 and HP1a) along the chromosome arms, with the most marked increase taking place on the X-chromosomes (Zhang et al. 2006). The JIL1 Figure 5 POF binds to a transgenic minimal PoX site. (A) High-resolution enrichment profiling at the PoX1 site shows that POF binds to the two genes SelG and CG1840. The plots show the mean enrichment values obtained as log 2 ChIP ratios. Numbers on the x-axis denote chromosomal position in megabases, and the y-axis shows ChIP enrichments. The genes are indicated; genes expressed from left to right are indicated by (+) and genes expressed in the opposite direction are indicated by (2). The extent of the 6.3-kb transgenic construct P[w + SelG CG1840] is indicated. (B) POF (yellow) and Setdb1 (green) immunostaining of a Setdb1.3HA/+; P[w + SelG CG1840] /+ female shows that POF and Setdb1 target both endogenous PoX1 and PoX2 (indicated by arrows) as well as the heterozygous transgene P[w + SelG CG1840] inserted at position 3L:65B (arrowhead). The boxes in the Setdb1/HP1 row show the combined image. Setdb1 is visualized using the Setdb1.3HA hemagglutinin tagged Setdb1 and an anti-HA antibody.
kinase, which is believed to counteract heterochromatin formation, is highly enriched on the male X-chromosome (Jin et al. 1999(Jin et al. , 2000Regnard et al. 2011) and is reported to be loosely attached to the MSLcomplex (Jin et al. 2000;Wang et al. 2013). It is noteworthy that POF, which targets genes in a heterochromatic environment, i.e., on the 4 th chromosome, has an intrinsic ability to target the male X-chromosome, as seen in, e.g., D. ananassae, and the targeting to X-chromosome sites reported here is dependent on roX RNAs. At the same time the MSLcomplex, which binds to and stimulates expression of genes on the male X-chromosome, has an intrinsic ability to target heterochromatin as seen in the roX1 roX2 mutant background. The link between these two systems is intriguing and promises to increase our understanding of balanced gene expression.
High-affinity targeting to the PoX1 and PoX2 loci therefore provides a novel system for further studies on targeting mechanisms involved in chromosome-wide gene regulation, the evolutionary relationship between POF and dosage compensation and the evolution of balanced gene expression, and the results favor a model involving not only the X-chromosome but also balance to heterochromatin.